The Thin Red Line

Essay on The ruby- deprivation zephyr by Charles Higson Society contains a vast majority of opposite types of people, and tout ensemble of them look, act, and think polarly. How we as individuals do these things, atomic number 18 greatly influenced by the people more or less us, as our differences makes us judge former(a)s. In creating our testify identity, our reliance on other(a)s is accordingly grand, which behind be either a fine or a irritating matter. For some, the prejudice in the perceptions of others can causality the truth to be exceedingly twisted. It can be disturbed to such a degree, that the image of others is completely opposite of how it is in truth.This is what for from apiece one one character in Higsons short drool The Red Line experiences. Higson nouss and plays with the type identity save in our postmodern confederation by victimisation irony in the characterization and by the use of a dynamic channelize of make. Berto and the strange hu humankind each begin contradictory personalities and looks. This is seen because the referee and the characters are introduced to different sides of the people in the legend. As the reader set ups a sense of the characters looks, personalities and thoughts, the persons in the story only get to see each other from the outside.Denises descriptions of the two workforce could not be more wrong, and consequently displays the contradictories perfectly. She sees the nameless man as individual spare, child-like and defenseless, and she sees Berto as one who has the look of a hunter. Cold, superior, in charge. 1 She thinks Berto will hurt her, alone he is actu exclusivelyy the one who assumes lovingly of her and the nameless man in reality dislikes her. None of that is played out though as the characters do not move with each other, as their narrow-mindedness kick them.The characters are prejudiced towards each other, which recruit to be wrong, making the military position i ronic. Denises thoughts of the two indicates the dramatic irony in the story, because we as readers know that Berto is the naive and innocent one, slice the nameless man is the hunter, who knock offs Berto in the end. Berto sees the nameless man as somebody harmless, that as he kills him, it creates situational irony. He had hoped that the man would have helped him find his modal value around London, and in a expression he does, since Bertos blood rail reminds him that he needed to take the red line It was ot the preferable outcome Berto could have hoped for though, of course, as he dies. The nameless man deems very negative of the two, mostly Berto that is so contrary himself, both in display and personality. The nameless man considers Berto to be iniquitous, while we as readers know the opposite is true. He in like manner supposes that Berto and Denise are eyeing each other up across the aisle2, and none of the two has romantic cheer in each other, and Denise even ends u p running from the former.The reader moldiness question each character, found on their fool on the others and how this changes their persona, and how each one of them is considered by our selves. The point of passel shifts in a route that it both creates suspense, and plays with our impression of personality. With each chapter, titled by a adopt station name, we follow a different characters day. In Goodge Street, a chapter towards the end, the characters stories intertwine, but the shifting continues. The paternity is wherefore not linear, which is typical of postmodern literature, as it creates suspense.There is dynamic and a sense of formulation in the story, which are also postmodern traits. Differing at all times, the point of view creates a sense that nothing is settled, curiously because of the conflicting information we obtain of the characters. We must therefore reconsider the story and the characters all the time, thus forcing us to reconsider the personas constan tly. The role identity plays in the story is a reflection of how it functions in postmodern company. This is ploughshare of the authors intention, as Higson wants us to question what we see, as not everyone/everything is what it seems.He also questions and makes us think about our own prejudices towards others, and how we view each other. He plays with the role appearance have in our society, and how all important(predicate) it can be. Berto gets murdered solely because of the way he looks. Higson also critiques the emphasis society puts on perception of others, as overly much prejudice can kill the ingenuous and righteousness in life. The nameless man is also extremely narcissitic, as he took to staying in, standing in expect of the mirror for hours on end, shaving and look at his reflection3, thus he is an archetype of someone in society Higson critiques.Alas, appearance plays an incredibly important role, as Denise run away from Berto and the nameless man kills the latter b ecause of it, even though we as readers know Berto is a respectable guy. The situation in the story is of course extreme, but Higson does this to get the point across more clearly and create irony. The contradictions are solar clear and the prejudices have serious consequences for the characters. It goes sternly wrong for the guy the reader sees as kind of a protagonist, and the characters see the opposer as the innocent and harmless one.We get different impressions of Denise, Berto and the nameless man based on their thoughts on each other and their life situation. These are obtained in a dynamic way, because the point of view shifts and the composition is not linear. Thus, we must reconsider the story at all times, and sense how we ourselves perceive each other. As Higson questions the concept of identity, he also makes us question ourselves, how we view others, and on what grounds we judge each other by. 1 Higson, Charles. The Thin Red Line, p. 69 l. 4 2 ibidem p. 69, l. 25 3 Ibid. p. 66, l. 30-31